US allies nervous about NSA spying

The revelation of a huge, secret U.S. spying program has made America's allies nervous about their own citizens' privacy.

LONDON  Revelations of a huge, secret U.S. Internet spying program have raised awkward questions for allies, forced to explain whether they let Washington spy on their citizens or benefited from snooping that would be illegal at home.

U.S. officials have confirmed the existence of the secret program, code-named PRISM, which, according to documents leaked to The Washington Post and The Guardian, has given them access to emails, web chats and other communications from companies such as Google, Facebook, Twitter and Skype.

U.S. law puts limits on the government's authority to snoop at home but virtually no restrictions on American spies eavesdropping on the communications of foreigners, including in allied countries with which Washington shares intelligence.

More from MSN News

After NSA revelations, what do we want?

Obama defends surveillance program as trade-off for security

NSA/Verizon snooping comes as no surprise to many

Did NSA's Internet spying foil plot to attack NYC subways?

That means Washington could provide friendly governments with virtually unlimited information about their own citizens' private communication on the Internet.

Britain's foreign secretary took to television Sunday to reassure Britons that London's own spies had not circumvented laws restricting their own activity by obtaining information collected by Washington.

In Germany, sensitive to decades of snooping by East German Stasi secret police, the opposition said Chancellor Angela Merkel should do more to protect Germans from U.S. spying and demand answers when President Barack Obama visits this month.

In Australia, a government source said the U.S. revelations could make it more difficult to pass a law allowing the government to obtain Internet data at home.

And in New Zealand, the revelations could cause further embarrassment for a government already forced to admit that it had illegally spied on an Internet file-sharing tycoon who is fighting extradition to the United States for computer piracy.

In Britain, which has forged the closest intelligence ties with Washington as the main U.S. battlefield ally in Iraq and Afghanistan, politicians asked whether access to data collected by Washington allowed London's own eavesdropping service, GCHQ, to evade limits on its own snooping powers.


Foreign Secretary William Hague would not say what information Britain received from the United States about British citizens but said it was "nonsense" that GCHQ would use cooperation with Washington to dodge British laws. He said he would answer questions on the subject Monday in Parliament.

"The idea that in GCHQ people are sitting around working out how to circumvent a U.K. law with another agency in another country is fanciful," Hague told BBC-TV on Sunday.

"Of course we share a lot of information with the United States," he said. "But if information arrives in the U.K. from the U.S., it's governed by our laws."

Douglas Alexander, the opposition Labour party's spokesman for foreign affairs, said Hague needed to be more open, adding: "It is vital that the Government now reassures people who are rightly concerned about these reports."

In Germany, which has strong rules on privacy, the opposition said the government was responsible for preventing wholesale U.S. spying on Germans.

More from MSN Money

Government likely to open criminal probe into NSA leaks: officials

The NSA is watching: Time to panic?

The NSA's cybersnoops are everywhere

NSA whistle-blowers say agency casts wide net

"No one has a problem with the USA keeping terrorists under surveillance — that has prevented terrorist attacks in Germany," said Thomas Oppermann, a senior lawmaker from the opposition Social Democrats.

"(But) total surveillance of all citizens by the USA is completely inappropriate. The German government must protect the privacy of Germans from the USA, too."

Renate Kuenast, a senior Greens lawmaker, said the affair "looks like it will be one of the biggest scandals in data sharing."

"Merkel cannot just look away and act like nothing has happened," Kuenast said.

In Australia, the conservative opposition, looking likely to win September elections, said it was "very troubled" by PRISM and concerned that Australians' data could be obtained. The influential Greens party called on the government to clarify whether Australia's own spy agencies had access to U.S. data.

"We'll examine carefully any implications in what has emerged for the security and privacy of Australians," Foreign Minister Bob Carr said in a TV interview Sunday, when asked whether Canberra had cooperated with the program.


Australia's spy and law-enforcement agencies want telecom companies and Internet service providers to continuously collect and store personal data to boost anti-terrorism and crime-fighting.

The legislation has been the subject of almost three years of heated closed-door negotiations. One government source said the initiative would be even more difficult to push through now.

"I'm not sure what the legislative backing for events in the U.S. has been. We have tried here to do ours as transparently as possible, with all the headaches that brings. This will make that worse," a government source said.

In New Zealand, Internet file sharing tycoon Kim Dotcom, fighting extradition to the United States on charges of online piracy, said U.S. surveillance agencies played a role in illegal snooping by New Zealand's security services in his own case.

Dotcom, born Kim Schmitz in Germany, is accused of helping to violate entertainment industry copyrights with his file-sharing network Megaupload, once one of the most popular sites on the Internet for downloading movies and music.

The New Zealand government has acknowledged that its Government Communications and Security Bureau illegally bugged Dotcom's communications before his house was raided in 2012 in the U.S. extradition case.

"The New Zealand GCSB spy agency was used to spy on my family because all surveillance was available to American agencies in real time," Dotcom tweeted.

"My case against the spy agency in New Zealand will show the degree of cooperation with the NSA (U.S. National Security Agency)," he added.

A New Zealand government spokeswoman declined to comment Sunday when asked if the GCSB cooperated with the NSA program.

"We do not comment on security and intelligence matters. New Zealand's intelligence agencies are subject to an oversight regime, which we are looking to strengthen," she said.

Additional reporting by Andreas Rinke and Michelle Martin in Berlin, Rob Taylor in Canberra and Naomi Tajitsu in Wellington; writing by Peter Graff; editing by Kevin Liffey


Join MSN News on social

Share your point of view with us on Facebook

Get the latest news and updates on Twitter

See photos and videos on tumblr